Michele Pasin / Quotes

I predict that 30 years from now the term “digital humanities” will have disappeared from our vocabulary

Astronomy went through a brief phase of “digital Astronomy” as a “transitional term” describing an emerging area of technical specialisation in astronomy ( a search search comes up pretty empty- as does google ngrams- digital astronomy has not been used as a term since the internet age -similarly the term ‘space astronomy ‘ peaked in 1989 according to google ngrams-also a transitional term ) . But this term has vanished from the vocabulary and it was clear that the ‘digital’ nature of the information was not conceptually useful but rather that the development enabled new astronomical research agendas facilitated by  easy cross correlation of data sets from different telescopes, coupled to computational and modelling methods ( this was briefly called ‘multi-wavelength’ astronomy, also a transitional term).

What has survived is ”The Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems (ADASS) conference is held each year at a different hosting astronomical institution. The conference provides a forum for scientists and programmers concerned with algorithms, software and software systems employed in the acquisition, reduction, analysis, and dissemination of astronomical data.

[...]

So I guess my thought is that the term ‘digital humanities’ is also a transitional term ( useful to funding agencies to focus on particular emerging practices) but is like digital astronomy not a conceptually or theoretically useful term. [..]

Anyway I predict that 30 years from now the term “digital humanities” will have disappeared from our vocabulary ( as has digital astronomy and space astronomy ) and that the unhappy organisations that have the term “digital humanities” in their name will be busy rebranding. The exciting thing is or course that the arts and humanities as well as the sciences and engineering are being transformed by the new research methods that are facilitated by the computational sciences in general.

Saved 10 August 2015 / malina.diatrope.com ↗

#digital-humanities #software #software-systems #vocabulary

Foundation for software evolution concepts: refactoring, reengineering etc..

Besides contributing to clarify concepts and terminologies in the software engineering community, our work could also be used as a foundation for software…

Towards An Ontology Of Software: A Requirements Engineering Perspective #software-systems #creation #software-products

How a software product gets new versions

Consider now one such software product, say MS Word for Mac. Starting with version V1, which denotes the specific software system constituting the software…

Towards An Ontology Of Software: A Requirements Engineering Perspective #software-systems #software-products

How programs act on the external environment

In conclusion, while in the previous section we focused on the immediate function of programs as technical artefacts –producing some effects inside a…

Towards An Ontology Of Software: A Requirements Engineering Perspective #environment #interface #software-systems #software-products

Software systems versus software products

While the essential function of a software system is to control the external behavior of a certain machine (i.e., according to the Jackson et al.’s approach…

Towards An Ontology Of Software: A Requirements Engineering Perspective #machine #software-systems #software-products #external-behavior

1st Difference: Vocabular

1st Difference: Vocabulary Of the differences between RDFS and OWL, the most important is just that OWL provides a far, far larger vocabulary that you can use…

Rdfs Vs. Owl - Cambridge Semantics #vocabulary #RDFS #things #RDF #world

Controlled vocabularies as authority files

A controlled vocabulary, also called an authority file, is an authoritative list of terms to be used in indexing (human or automated). A controlled vocabulary…

About Taxonomies & Controlled Vocabularies #authority-files #indexing #thesaurus #vocabulary #files #taxonomy