Michele Pasin / Quotes

The common denominators of constructivist approaches

The common denominators of constructivist approaches can be summarized as follows.

Constructivist approaches question the Cartesian separation between the objective world and subjective experience; Consequently, they demand the inclusion of the observer in scientific explanations; Representationalism is rejected; knowledge is a system-related cognitive process rather than a mapping of an objective world onto subjective cognitive structures; According to constructivist approaches, it is futile to claim that knowledge approaches reality; reality is brought forth by the subject rather than passively received; Constructivist approaches entertain an agnostic relationship with reality, which is considered beyond our cognitive horizon; any reference to it should be refrained from; Therefore, the focus of research moves from the world that consists of matter to the world that consists of what matters; Constructivist approaches focus on self-referential and organizationally closed systems; such systems strive for control over their inputs rather than their outputs; With regard to scientific explanations, constructivist approaches favor a process-oriented approach rather than a substance-based perspective, e.g. living systems are defined by the processes whereby they constitute and maintain their own organization; Constructivist approaches emphasize the “individual as personal scientist” approach; sociality is defined as accommodation within the framework of social interaction; Finally, constructivist approaches ask for an open and less dogmatic approach to science in order to generate the flexibility that is needed to cope with today’s scientific frontiers.

Saved 23 April 2015 / www.univie.ac.at ↗

#cognitive-processes

Computations have no ontological status

Manzotti suggests that there is actually no such thing as information. Therefore, neither machines nor biologically based nervous systems can process it more…

Beyond Zero and One (Andrew Smart) #computation #information #ontology #cognitive-processes

Still no theory of how we attribute minds

Looking at the results from these various studies, it is hard to avoid having the sense that one should be able to construct a single unified theory that…

Can A Robot, An Insect Or God Be Aware?: Scientific American #cognitive-processes #intuition #psychological-state #theory

The Mundurucu and words for numbers

Numerical cognition and its relationship to linguistic evolution is a large area of active research. In contrast to the Mangarevan example, where a complex…

Beyond Zero and One (Andrew Smart) #number #language #culture #cognitive-processes

Why we think in stereotypes

Human beings think in terms of stereotypes, for good reasons. Without mental short cuts, we simply couldn’t get by. There is just too much information to…

The Ego Trick (baggini, Julian) #thinking #information #cognitive-processes