Michele Pasin / Quotes

Scientific publishing is a relic from another age

Scientific journals keep alive a culture of unnecessary adjudication, delay, corruption-rich anonymous peer review, and conclusions without the underlying data sets. Enough! What the world needs are publishing platforms, not journals. Here is what a publishing platform does:

  1. A “hygiene” check to ensure that what is proposed to be published is science (uses scientific method, interrogates data properly) but makes NO attempt to determine interest, impact or ultimate correctness.
  2. Provide a platform to publish the findings in a readable and accessible format, without any delay.
  3. Provide the machinery of open and transparent peer review so that conclusions of the paper can be vetted formally by the scientific community, not by an editor.
  4. Provide the functionality to host and
  5. support scientific dialogue about the paper, both commentary and rebuttal fully in the open on the Web.
  6. Ensure that ALL data associated with the paper are published and accessible. If you aren’t willing to publish your data nobody should be willing to publish your paper.
  7. Publish everything and make publishing quick and easy. A publishing platform does not discriminate between a deep research paper and a small observational note, or indeed, an editorial piece. All articles of all types can advance science and benefit society.

It is time for publishing -- the sole window through which science is made visible to the world -- to embrace the open culture of the Internet. In an age of serious global challenges, science will continue to be the source for answers. Those answers must be delivered with speed, fairness, transparency, and freedom from bias. The scientific journal is a relic of another age.

Saved 1 December 2014 / insights.wired.com ↗

#science #answers #journals #peer-review #culture

Agnosticism

“But what is truth?” asks a certain kind of skeptic. That, suggests the late Nobel prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman above, depends upon your method. If…

Richard Feynman On Religion, Science, The Search For Truth & Our Willingness To Live With Doubt - Open Culture #science #answers #questions #doubt

What is open science

So what’s Open? Open has worked in other fields, especially software. Moedas continues: In my view, there is a strong economic, scientific and moral case for…

What Is “open Science”? Carlos Moedas Gets It, Do You? | Petermr's Blog #answers #software #scientists #science

Eugene garfield and the beginning of the impact factor

Following ideas inspired by Vannevar Bush's famous 1945 article "As We May Think", Garfield undertook the development of a comprehensive citation index…

Eugene Garfield - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia #science #journals #social-sciences #humanity

Peer review shouldn't be used on larger topics

A 1984 rejection letter from Nature of your paper outlining the Gaia hypothesis is displayed in the exhibition. What do you think of peer review — is it…

James Lovelock Reflects On Gaia's Legacy : Nature News & Comment #peer-review #hypothesis #components

Computers

Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. (Pablo Picasso)

The Philosophical Computer: Exploratory Essays In Philosophical Computer Modeling #answers #computer

Science and religion

Both Feynman and Tyson seem to agree that the scientific and Creationist methods for discovering “truth,” whatever that may be, are basically incompatible…

Richard Feynman On Religion, Science, The Search For Truth & Our Willingness To Live With Doubt - Open Culture #truth #answers #meaning #ignorance #mystery