Michele Pasin / Quotes

Live-data prototypes

Live-data prototypes are a little tougher to explain, but they are absolutely critical and the cost of producing them is dropping rapidly so I’m loving them more all the time. The main purpose of a live-data prototype is to actually prove something – normally it’s to prove whether an idea (a feature, a design approach, a workflow) really works. In order to know this, we typically need to do two things. First, we need the prototype to access our real data sources – like actually search our live inventory and show products that are really available right now. Second, we need to be able to send live traffic, in quantity, to the prototype.

The key is that we sure don’t want to have to build, test and deploy a real product in order to do this. That would take far too long, and cost far too much, and yield huge waste. And we don’t. A live-data prototype is a very limited implementation – typically just the critical use cases, and none of the “productization” that’s normally required like full use cases, test automation, SEO work, internationalization and localization, performance and scalability, etc. A live-data prototype is a fraction of the effort, but you get big value. You do have to keep in mind two big limitations. First, this is code so it requires your developers to create the live-data prototype and not your designers. Second, this is not a product, and you can’t run a business with it, so if the tests go well, you’ll still need to allow your engineers to take the time to productize the code.

[...] Normally we’ll test a live-data prototype in an A/B test, but we can also do an opt-in test or an invite-only test. The key is that real users will use the live-data prototype for real, and this will generate real data (analytics) that we can compare to our current product to see if this new approach actually performs better.

Saved 17 February 2014 / www.svpg.com ↗

#use-cases #prototype #code

Leap-of-faith assumptions and the minimum viable product

To apply the scientific method to a startup, we need to identify which hypotheses to test. I call the riskiest elements of a startup’s plan, the parts on…

The Lean Startup (Eric Ries) #hypothesis #prototype #startups #assumption

Four routes to Semantic Web progress

We anticipate that progress in development of the Semantic Web will take place by: 1. Moving along the semantic continuum from less clearly specified…

Where Are The Semantics In The Semantic Web? #Semantic-Web #semantics #Web #web-content #use-cases

Four use cases for triplestores

• Search and Discovery Search and discovery covers a broad set of applications but generally refers to any use case where organizations want to improve the…

The Truth About Triplestores: The Top 8 Things You Need To Know When Considering A Triplestore - See More At: Http://ontotext.com/semantic-resources/#white-paper #users #use-cases #search #analysts

Keep control of your enterprise ontology

When designing a traditional architecture with a relational database near or at the bottom of your tech stack, the relational model is constructed to…

3 More C's Of Ontology Engineering In The Enterprise #ontology #use-cases #data-model #architecture #requirements #domain-specific-ontology

Triples all the way down

RDF is meant to solve the problem of meaningfully publishing data (not just documents) on the World Wide Web. Beyond that, do what you want. More…

Two Misconceptions About The Semantic Web #World-Wide-Web #Wide-Web #RDF-data #explicit-semantics #use-cases #Web

A program is not its code, process or algorithm

we agree with Irmak that we cannot identify a program either with a code, a process, or an algorithm. The reason is that this view conflicts with common…

Towards An Ontology Of Software: A Requirements Engineering Perspective #code #algorithm #same-algorithm #program