Michele Pasin / Quotes

Reification, contexts and named graphs

The body of knowledge modeled by a collection of statements may be subjected to reification, in which each statement (that is each triple subject-predicate-object altogether) is assigned a URI and treated as a resource about which additional statements can be made, as in "Jane says that John is the author of document X". Reification is sometimes important in order to deduce a level of confidence or degree of usefulness for each statement. In a reified RDF database, each original statement, being a resource, itself, most likely has at least three additional statements made about it: one to assert that its subject is some resource, one to assert that its predicate is some resource, and one to assert that its object is some resource or literal. More statements about the original statement may also exist, depending on the application's needs. Borrowing from concepts available in logic (and as illustrated in graphical notations such as conceptual graphs and topic maps), some RDF model implementations acknowledge that it is sometimes useful to group statements according to different criteria, called situations, contexts, or scopes, as discussed in articles by RDF specification co-editor Graham Klyne.[11][12] For example, a statement can be associated with a context, named by a URI, in order to assert an "is true in" relationship. As another example, it is sometimes convenient to group statements by their source, which can be identified by a URI, such as the URI of a particular RDF/XML document. Then, when updates are made to the source, corresponding statements can be changed in the model, as well. Implementation of scopes does not necessarily require fully reified statements. Some implementations allow a single scope identifier to be associated with a statement that has not been assigned a URI, itself.[13][14] Likewise named graphs in which a set of triples is named by a URI can represent context without the need to reify the triples.[15]

Saved 26 February 2013 / en.wikipedia.org ↗

#reification #context #resources #statements #original-statement

Reifying a statement is not asserting it

Note that asserting the reification is not the same as asserting the original statement, and neither implies the other. That is, when someone says that John…

Rdf Primer #weight #statements #original-statement #John #reification

Naming statements happens outside RDF

RDF does not provide a built-in way of indicating how a URIref like exproducts:triple12345 is associated with a particular statement or graph, any more than…

Rdf Primer #RDF #URI #documents #RDF-documents #statements #resources

Aspects of modism criticized in the 13th century

Two other aspects of modism are in the focus of these criticisms: (1) the assertion of a close structural analogy between spoken or mental language and…

Medieval Semiotics (meier-oeser, Stephan) #language #reification #voice

Multiplicity multiplies the mistake of reification

this is where I think talk of multiplicity repeats the error it is trying to correct. The problem with our intuitive sense of self is that it excessively…

The Ego Trick (baggini, Julian) #multiple-selves #reification #unity #self

Quine: ontology is what variables range over

Quine wrote that one's ontology coincides with the ranges of the variables in one's formalism. This usage is entirely appropriate for AI. Present…

Ontology And Reification #questions #philosophers #speech-acts #reification

Reification is not quotation

It is also important to note that the interpretation of reification described here is not the same as "quotation", as found in some languages. Instead, the…

Rdf Primer #reification #language #things